Yeah I guess they are for now.
Now, a post.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....
Global warming? WE'RE ALL Gonna die.
Hmm......
This is a good colour scheme I have here. White is hard on the eyes after a while.
If the entire Earth was an artificial alien moving platform, orbiting as it normally would and with stuff growing on it but with an engine instead of a core, would you still love it like you do now? Please rate on a scale from "Yes" to "No" and answer in complete sentences.
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Sunday, October 7, 2007
Saturday, September 29, 2007
Ok, here's something that's actually somewhat true and/or meaningful:
Everyone has their own strengths and weaknesses, and lying to cover up those weaknesses isn't going to do any good for anyone. The only possible utopia is one in which everyone can not only live together, but share with each other every aspect of themselves as intimately as they would in the almost fantastically unique case of "true love", but due to everyone's own feelings of insecurity and their insistent censoring of thoughts, their own personal walls stay in place, and their whole closeted, personal sense of the "world" retains intact, and thus, their sense of identity and individuality. Thinking for yourself is not necessarily the same thing as being yourself.
Everyone has their own strengths and weaknesses, and lying to cover up those weaknesses isn't going to do any good for anyone. The only possible utopia is one in which everyone can not only live together, but share with each other every aspect of themselves as intimately as they would in the almost fantastically unique case of "true love", but due to everyone's own feelings of insecurity and their insistent censoring of thoughts, their own personal walls stay in place, and their whole closeted, personal sense of the "world" retains intact, and thus, their sense of identity and individuality. Thinking for yourself is not necessarily the same thing as being yourself.
Friday, September 28, 2007
Sunday, September 23, 2007
How is smoking pot any different from eating candy? Neither of them are physically addictive, both of them are psychologically addictive. Both of them have no benefit other than to activate reward pathways. One of them is the desire to taste something delicious set off by generations of evolution, and the other is the desire to taste a delicious state of mind set off by your apathy with your current state of mind, so the only argument that remains is whether or not naturalism is more "valid" than chemical interactions, and that's just retarded.
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)